Marussia Virgin Racing partners Soleco

No Comments »

New partner Soleco supports Jérôme D’Ambrosio

 Hot on the heels of Jérôme D’Ambrosio’s home Grand Prix in Belgium, Marussia Virgin Racing is pleased to announce a new partnership with Belgian company Soleco ahead of this weekend’s final European round of the 2011 FIA Formula One World Championship in Italy.

Based in Opglabbeek, Soleco is an environmental company that transforms sunshine into electricity through photovoltaic systems such as solar panels and inverters. Soleco pledged their support to Jérôme after he, along with other drivers from the Gravity Sport Management stable, made a personal commitment to offset the carbon footprint associated with his Formula One racing career.

The new partnership will see the Soleco logo appearing on Jérôme’s racesuit and helmet, as well as on the Marussia Virgin Racing MVR-02 race car, for the balance of the 2011 season.

Andy Webb, CEO, Marussia Virgin Racing
“We are delighted to welcome Soleco to Marussia Virgin Racing and congratulations to Jérôme. He has acquitted himself well in his debut year of Formula One racing and it is very positive for him to have attracted the attentions of an emerging Belgian company.”

Bob Geekens, CEO, Soleco
“After many years, finally there is a Belgian driver back in Formula One and Soleco is pleased to be the first Belgian company to support Jérôme on his journey. To underpin its international activities, Soleco Green Energy has found a perfect ambassador in Jérôme and the Marussia Virgin Racing team. This partnership will help us to develop our international ambitions and Soleco will benefit from excellent strategic marketing opportunities. Jérôme is committed to offsetting his carbon emissions. To do so, Soleco will compensate his carbon footprint by investing in renewable energy projects and donating some of the returns to charity and the development of carbon neutral projects and products.”

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted on September 8th 2011 in News flash

Bamboo bikes made in Zambia, sold around the world

No Comments »

Lusaka-based Zambikes are building bikes in Zambia for sale around the world through California-based Zambikes International.

alttext

After writing about two different bamboo bicycle projects in Africa in the past few years, we recently came across further evidence that the concept is catching on. Zambia is the focus this time, however, thanks toZambikes, which builds bikes in that country for sale around the world.

Unemployment is more than 50 percent in Zambia, and literacy is low. For the past three years, Lusaka-based Zambikes has been serving the Zambian community with “quality, life-changing transportation products and healthy training and development for their employees,” in the organization’s own words. Now, through California-based Zambikes International, Zambikes’ products are being offered for sale around the globe. The line of bamboo bicycles is available for worldwide delivery through Zambikes International’s online store — a complete single-speed bike costs USD 1,250 — with sales reps and demonstration outlets in six locations across the United States as well as a dealer in Capetown, South Africa. Also available from Zambikes are a cargo bike and a “Zambulance,” or bicycle ambulance trailer.

Zambikes Bamboo Frames Commercial from Russell Brownley on Vimeo.

It’s one thing to donate resources and supplies to the needy in developing nations, but setting up a full-fledged global industry there gives citizens a self-sustaining future. Socially minded entrepreneurs: one to sponsor or partner with!

Website: www.zambikes.com

Contact: info@zambikesint.com

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted on September 6th 2011 in News flash, videos

Tidal energy – the UK’s best kept secret

No Comments »

Tidal energy could provide a quarter of the UK’s electricity, but renewable experts are lukewarm because they are overestimating the cost

Underwater tidal power station near the Sound of Islay

Underwater 10 megawatt tidal stream project in the Sound of Islay between the Hebridean islands of Islay and Jura. Photograph: ScottishPower Renewables

The latest report on Renewables from the Committee on Climate Change (CCC) offers lukewarm support for electricity generation from tidal streams. The UK has some of the fiercest tidal currents in the world, but the CCC says the tidal turbines will deliver energy at a higher cost than PV in 2040. The assumptions behind this pessimism are questioned in this article.

The tides around Britain’s coasts sweep huge volumes of water back and forth at substantial speeds. The energy contained in the tidal races off the west of the UK is as great as anywhere in the world. Because water is a thousand or so times heavier than air, the maximum speeds of perhaps 6 metres a second are capable of generating far more electricity per square metre of turbine area than a windmill. The Pentland Firth, the narrow run of water between the north-east tip of Scotland and the Orkney islands, is possibly the best place in the world to turn racing tides into electricity. The challenges are immense: massive steel structures need to be made that survive huge stresses, day after day.

The rewards for tidal stream developers are commensurate. Unlike other renewable technologies, tidal power is utterly predictable for the entire life of a turbine. We know to the minute when the tides on a particular day will be at their peak. Once installed, the running costs of tidal stream technology will be low. The environmental impact of tidal turbines appears to be very small. And the UK could probably provide a quarter of its electricity from tides. (And much more if an environmentally acceptable means was found of damming the Severn tides).

The CCC might then have been expected to push for a significant programme of support for tidal. Its reservations appear to be as follows.

a) Tidal generation does not help with the ‘intermittency’ problem of renewables generation.

b) The levels of yield are relatively low. (Yield is the percentage of rated power that can be delivered in a typical day.)

c) The cost of capital is high for a developer using tidal turbines because of the risk of the technology not working

d) The relatively small scope for learning curve improvements.

Intermittency

An individual tidal turbine will generate most electricity when the tide is running fastest. This will be at approximately the mid point between high and low tides. The CCC therefore says that tidal power will not help deal with periods of low production.

The cycle of marine power (tidal plus wave) suggests that total output will fall to zero four times a day. This would only be the case if all the turbines were sited at the same place. Turbines placed, as they will be, all around the coasts of Great Britain will generate maximum power at different times of the day. On the day I looked at the tide tables, the tides in the Channel Islands (where there are some extremely powerful races) were completely unsynchronised with the tides in northern Scotland. Two turbines, one off Alderney, one off John O’Groats, would together produce substantial amounts of (entirely predictable) power every second of the day. Tidal power is as dispatchable as nuclear.

Yields are low

The CCC offers a view as to the output of a tidal turbine, suggesting that in a ‘high’ case the figure will be 40%. That is, the average electricity output of a 1MW turbine over the course of a year will be 400kW.

Actually, the one piece of reliable data on this number suggests a much higher figure. The UK’s hugely impressive tidal turbine developer, Marine Current Turbines (MCT), has had a device in the waters of Strangford Lough for several years. This early turbine has produced 50% of its rated power. The difference is important: it means that electricity generation costs are 25% lower than the CCC would otherwise have predicted.

The cost of capital is high

I think the CCC – normally so forensically rigorous – makes an error here, guided by its capital markets advisors Oxera. The CCC suggests that capital projects have to earn a return determined by the ‘riskiness’ of the investment. The debate over what types of ‘risk’ need to be paid for is complex and almost theological in its intensity. But I will not argue about this and will accept that early tidal power projects are ‘risky’ and that investors will therefore expect high returns to compensate for their exposure.

But let’s dissect what the ‘risk’ of a tidal project actually is. At its simplest, it is that the technology will fail. And, indeed, most tidal turbines have simply broken into pieces in the early months of their life in the seas. But this is the only risk. Once working successfully, the tidal currents will flow for as long as the moon circles the earth. There are no commodities markets to disrupt the returns, no risk of increased operating costs once the technology is proven. To say that tidal has a high cost of capital is wrong: the early developers take big risks but once the technology matures, the operating risk disappears. The right assumption to make about tidal is that has huge cost of capital today, but will have very low rates in the future once the technology is proven. Instead, the CCC’s advisers weight tidal down with high returns on capital for ever. This unfairly penalises tidal stream power, and all other sources of energy in their early stages of development.

Small scope for learning curve improvements

Other renewable technologies have generally reduced in underlying cost by 10 or 15% for every doubling of the output of these devices. (This is an utterly standard ‘experience’ effect- we’ll assume tidal turbine costs only fall by 10% for each doubling).

To date, the world tidal industry has probably installed less than 20 full-scale production devices on the seabed. In fact, you could plausibly say that the MCT Northern Irish turbine is the only such turbine. Assume nevertheless that today’s accumulated production experience is 20 units.

But the CCC, advised in this case by Mott McDonald, says that costs today are about 20.5 pence per kilowatt hour of electricity generated and will only fall to 15.25 pence in 2040, a reduction of slightly more than 25% (the mid-point of cost ranges in the CCC report). The learning curve model assumes that a 10% reduction will typically come after a doubling of total production to 40 units. A further 10% reduction comes when accumulated volume rises to 80.

The arithmetic is not complex. If Mott McDonald thinks that the costs will only fall to 15.25, it must believe that the worldwide tidal industry will install less than 160 turbines before 2040.

The CCC’s analysis locks tidal stream technology into relative failure. Costs are high, and the technology risk is great. So no developers use the tidal turbines and costs remain stubbornly high. The cycle continues. Of course this could indeed be the future. But with sustained effort and support, tidal energy may become of the UK’s most important industries. In MCT – a business few people have ever heard of – the country has the most technically advanced marine energy company in the world. I think it deserves all the backing it can get.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted on May 18th 2011 in News flash

Development of Dams in West Africa: new report on evolution of international policy on dams

No Comments »

Ten years after the publication of the World Commission on Dams report, the West and Central Africa office of IUCN commissioned a study to look at the approaches to decision-making around large dams.

Image type barrage

Photo: CCRE-UICN

In close collaboration with the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), the report informs the current regional Consultation on Large Infrastructures Projects in the Water Sector in the ECOWAS Zone. More information on the Dialogue régional sur les grandes infrastructures hydrauliques can be found here.

The purpose of the study has been to review the diversity of decision-making around environmental and social aspects concerning the development of large dams in both developing countries and in emerging economies. Case studies were carried out of the Lom Pangar Hydropower Project in Cameroon, and of the Water Charter of the Senegal River (la Charte des Eaux du Fleuve Sénégal).

The report proposes a simple framework of analysis for different levels of practice, and emphasises the importance of extending the traditional core commercial and financial transactions relating to finance for large infrastructure. Extending this framework to include the environmental and social aspects as project components embeds social and environmental aspects at the core of the financial decision making, rather than these critical elements appearing as bolt-on additions to a robust financial transaction process.

In preparing the report, perspectives of key informants representing a range of interests were gathered, including review of five policies at international level (the World Bank’s Safeguard Policies, the IFC Performance Standards, the ‘Equator Principles’, the ‘Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Protocol’ and the report of the World Commission on Dams).

The report states: ‘Review of five leading international policies has helped to identify the niche of each policy in relation to the design of dam projects where leading actors share common ground, and where they advocate differing approaches. Key to creating good projects is bringing together the perspectives of commercial contracting and public policy-making. The Lom Pangar project in Cameroon is a good example of this interaction, the project preparation process has been aimed at designing a project which is both economically viable and environmentally and socially sustainable’.

This report helps us evaluate and understand good practice and recognise the role of dams as investments in national economies. We will use this knowledge as we further update our strategy on dams this year”, said Ousmane Diallo, IUCN Regional Water Coordinator for West and Central Africa.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted on February 10th 2011 in News flash

Carbon fraud may force longer closure of EU emissions trading

No Comments »

EU emissions trading scheme may remain suspended as governments struggle to beef up security

To match Interview POLAND-BELCHATOW/

The chimneys of Belchatow Power Station, Europe’s largest biggest coal-fired power plant. European carbon trading was due to restart on Wednesday but may be delayed further after a £28m fraud Photograph: Peter Andrews/REUTERS

Hopes that a key tool in the fight against climate change can be brought back into full operation on Wednesday were fading as national governments struggled to beef up security after a huge carbon fraud was uncovered in Europe’s pioneering emissions trading scheme (ETS).

But the British government said it was confident the UK side of the market was highly secure and there was little risk of local users being vulnerable.

The European commission stepped in to ban “spot” trading in carbon on any local exchanges last Wednesday after a £28m cyber attack on the Czech, Austrian and other national markets and was hoping to lift the restriction this week but there are growing fears that new security will not be in place on time in all locations.

Market experts are now calling for victims of carbon trading fraud to be compensated by the European Union to prevent the latest in a series of scandals turning traders off the ETS, which was meant to provide a blueprint for national carbon reduction schemes to be introduced in America and further afield.

More than half of the 27 countries around Europe engaged in the “cap and trade” ETS scheme, under which polluting companies are forced to buy carbon certificates if they do not keep their CO2 output below their agreed quota, were said by the EU to have inadequate security systems in place.

Carbon market experts expressed doubt that everything could be sorted out by Wednesday. “I am not banking on any of this being sorted in a hurry,” said one. “The EU’s record on IT issues is not good. It took them a year and a half longer than they said to link the CITL (Community Independent Transaction Log) with the UN’s ITL (International Transaction Log) and even then they refused to take any responsibility for the delay,” he added.

There have already been predictions that the level of losses to those traders or small industrial companies unable to use the full market would be £60m even if the market did open for full business again on Wednesday. The EC itself admitted that the Wednesday deadline could not be guaranteed.

There has been widespread condemnation of the slow speed with which the EU has acted after a series of fraud attacks on the ETS market in the past few years.

Connie Hildegaard, the EC climate commissioner, claimed that the scheme was a victim of its own success. “Over the last years, the market has reached a size which makes it a potential target of fraudulent practices.

“Therefore, as the market matures and grows further, it is critical that it continues to be subject to appropriate and effective regulatory oversight.”

The Department of Energy and Climate Change said at the weekend that it supported the moves to tighten systems around Europe. “The security of the carbon market is very important and this period of time will allow registry administrators to address the security of their registry. The UK Registry Administrator, the Environment Agency, has assessed the risk to UK account holders and concluded that because of the security systems used in the UK Registry successful attacks are unlikely.

But the EC has further enraged sections of the carbon market by botching an announcement late last week on new “offset” procedures whereby companies in the developing world can claim carbon credits for building “green” industrial schemes designed to take carbon out of the atmosphere.

One senior banker said Brussels “career” civil servants running the EU emissions trading scheme should hand over control to a new independent financial body. On Friday, their latest gaffe was to botch a key announcement, causing the price of carbon to gyrate. “These foibles used to be faintly amusing, but now they’re becoming threatening,” he said.

Meanwhile Andrew Hedge, a partner from Norton Rose law firm, said that more companies involved in carbon trading are calling for an EU backed insurance fund to be set up to cover any such losses. He warned that no system could ever be 100% fraud proof, despite promises by the commission to tighten software security in the light of the growing problem with fraud.

“The Commission is now pushing for stronger security and has taken welcome action to insist national registries are secure. But you can never have 100% security – there will always potentially be a corrupt individual or a more sophisticated cyber attack. It’s incumbent on the EC and member states to protect participants in the market. Many players would like some sort of insurance mechanism set up so that if they unwittingly buy stolen allowances, there is a mechanism by which they can return these to the authorities in exchange for replacement allowances.”

The senior banker, talking to the Guardian on condition of anonymity, also called on the European commission to issue a directive ruling that stolen allowances, once they are traded in the market, are not declared void if uncovered. “Unpicking transactions of stolen allowances which involves many people becomes very difficult. You can’t have an effective market if everyone is looking over their shoulders all the time.” Any innocent originator of the stolen allowance should instead be compensated for the loss, he said.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted on January 26th 2011 in News flash

Can Brazil live up to its promise as a ‘natural knowledge economy’?

No Comments »

To forge a new direction, nation must avoid the petrol-power trap

Amazon-oil-gas

The Arara pole, part of the Urucu oilfield, emerges from the Amazon rainforest, 650km south-east of Manaus, Brazil. Photograph: Antonio Scorza/AFP

Outside Dr Gilberto Cãmara’s office, there is a beautiful satellite map ofBrazil. From the fractal elegance of the Amazon and its tributaries to the twinkling mega-cities of Sao Paolo and Rio de Janeiro, the map shows why he thinks Brazil can be the world’s first environmental superpower.

He leads Brazil’s National Institute for Space Research (Inpe), one of the top 50 research organisations in the world. His startling claim, he explains in his easy English, rests on turning a piece of standard economic theory on its head. Nations develop their economies by moving up the value chain, away from churning out commodities and towards manufacturing, say the textbooks. Brazil has abundant natural resources, so the key to prosperity is to start making stuff, right? Wrong, he says, because of the “China effect”.

China mass manufactures at rock-bottom prices, with the consequence that over the past two decades the cost of manufactured goods has fallen fast, while demand has pushed up the cost of the commodities used to make the goods. This leads Camara to his slogan: “Brazil – the natural knowledge economy“. He describes this as applying knowledge and technology to commodities to boost their value, and reels off examples: biofuels, in which Brazil leads thanks to its sugar cane ethanol and growing biodiesel production; renewable energy – 47% of the country’s energy is already green, a world record; and climate change – Brazil’s Amazon is vital to the planet’s health.

“Brazil’s natural knowledge economy offers more opportunities for internal [national] research than our manufacturing industry,” he says. Brazil wouldn’t be the first nation to get rich on its resources, but it aims to be the first to do so without destroying its own economy or environment.

So that’s the pitch. What are the catches? I can think of a few: the country’s jumbo oil discoveries, continuing deforestation, fast-rising energy needs, a vast rich-poor divide and widespread local corruption, not to mention whether Brazil can find a way to get paid the premium needed to fund environmental responsibility.

Let’s take the vast oil finds off the coast of Rio – 50bn barrels – which within a few years will make Brazil a global petro-power. That, Brazil’s special ambassador for climate change, Sergio Serra, told me, presents a “big challenge”. “Our present policy is not to change the energy mix,” he said, which is dominated by hydroelectric power and biofuels. “But of course the temptation will be great, enormous.” An economy supercharged by petrol would not be environmental.

Keeping to your greenhouse gas emissions pledges would be, on the other hand. And, gushing oil or not, the environment minister, Izabella Teixeira, says Brazil will meet its 2020 targets, which are pretty tough for an emerging country. The key is stopping deforestation, particularly in the Amazon, and the latest figures suggest Brazil is making fast progress. But populist changes proposed to the Forest Code laws protecting the forest, bolstered by Brazil’s chasm between rich and poor and allegations of a rich world conspiracy to keep Brazil poor, pose a serious threat.

Nonetheless, Teixeira is clear that the economic development of the Amazon region, and the infrastructure to achieve it, will forge ahead.

Maurio Zimmermann, the energy minister, also shows green conviction: 50% of the fuel in Brazil’s cars is ethanol; the government auction to buy 2,400MW of wind power was oversubscribed by four times; carbon capture and storage experiments are under way.

Brazil is at a major fork in the road on its journey to prosperity. One path is rough, and has never been walked by any country: the route to growth without environmental and atmospheric vandalism. The other is well paved and lit, with an easy-to-follow map. It is called business as usual, though it may very well end in a sheer drop. Success is far from assured, but Brazil appears ready to take on the hard road and prove that “environmental superpower” is not an oxymoron.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted on August 11th 2010 in News flash

Mekong dams threaten rare giant fish

No Comments »

Giant Catfish  Pangasianodon gigas.

© WWF

Giant catfish (Pangasianodon gigas)

Wild populations of the iconic Mekong giant catfish will be driven to extinction if hydropower dams planned for the Mekong River go ahead, says a new report by WWF. 

The report, River of Giants: Giant Fish of the Mekong, profiles four giant fish living in the Mekong that rank within the top 10 largest freshwater fish on the planet (see list of top 10 at bottom of page). 

At half the length of a bus and weighing up to 600kgs, the Mekong River’s giant freshwater stingray (Dasyatis laosensis) is the world’s largest freshwater fish. The critically endangered and culturally fabled Mekong giant catfish (Pangasianodon gigas) ranks third at up to 3 metres in length and 350kgs.

Dam will present unsurmountable barrier for giant fish

“A fish the size of a Mekong giant catfish, simply will not be able to swim across a large barrier like a dam to reach its spawning grounds upstream,” said Roger Mollot, Freshwater Biologist for WWF-Laos. “This would lead to the collapse of the wild population of this iconic species.”

Current scientific information suggests the Mekong giant catfish migrate from the  Tonle Sap Lake in Cambodia up the Mekong River to spawn in northern Thailand and Laos. Any dam built on the lower Mekong River mainstream will block this migration route. 

The hydropower dam planned on the  Mekong River at Sayabouly Province, northern Laos, is a threat to the survival of the wild population of Mekong giant catfish. The Sayabouly Dam is the first lower Mekong River mainstream dam to enter a critical stage of assessment before member countries of the Mekong River Commission advise on whether to approve its construction. 

The Mekong River.

© WWF The Mekong River.

Mekong River home to more giant freshwater fish than any other

“More giant fish live in the Mekong than any other river on Earth,” said Ms Dang Thuy Trang, Mekong River Ecoregion Coordinator for the WWF Greater Mekong Programme. “Currently, the Lower Mekong remains free-flowing, which presents a rare opportunity for the conservation of these species. But the clock is ticking.” 

The other Mekong giant fish featured in the report are the “dog-eating” catfish (Pangasius sanitwongsei), named because it has been caught using dog meat as bait, and the giant barb (Catlocarpio siamensis), the national fish of Cambodia and largest carp in the world. At 300kgs each, these fish tie for fifth place on the global top ten.

Dams will amplify the impact of climate change on fisheries and agriculture 

However, the impacts of lower Mekong River mainstream dams are not restricted to these Mekong giants, they would also exacerbate the impacts of climate change on the Mekong River Delta, one of the world’s most productive regions for fisheries and agriculture.

Building the Sayabouly Dam would reduce sediment flowing downstream to the Mekong River Delta, increasing the vulnerability of this area to the impacts of climate change like sea level rise.

Map of the Mekong dams.

© WWFMap of the Mekong dams

There are alternatives 

WWF supports a delay in the approval of the mainstream dams, including the Sayabouly Dam, to ensure a comprehensive understanding of all the positive and negative impacts of their construction and operation. 

To meet immediate energy demands, WWF promotes sustainable hydropower projects on tributaries of the Mekong River, prioritising those that already have hydropower dams developed on them.

The Global Top 10 Giant Freshwater Fish

  1. Giant freshwater stingray (Himantura chaophraya) 600kg (500cm, 240cm disc width) Mekong River Basin
  2. Chinese paddlefish (Psephurus gladius) 500kg (700cm) Yangtze River Basin
  3. Mekong giant catfish (Pangasianodon gigas) 350kg (300cm) Mekong River Basin
  4. Wels catfish (Silurus glanis) 306kg (500cm) Widespread in Europe and Asia
  5. Giant pangasius (dog-eating catfish) (Pangasius sanitwongsei) 300kg (300cm) Mekong River Basin
  6. Giant barb (Catlocarpio siamensis) 300kg (300cm) Mekong River Basin
  7. Arapaima (pirarucu; paiche) (Arapaima gigas) 200kg (450cm) Amazon River Basin
  8. Piraíba (laulau; lechero) (Brachyplatystoma filamentosum) 200kg (360cm) Amazon River Basin
  9. Nile perch (Lates niloticus) 200kg (200cm) Nile River Basin
  10. Alligator gar (Atractosteus spatula) 137kg (305cm) Mississippi River Basin

 

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted on July 29th 2010 in News flash

Engineers race to design world’s biggest offshore wind turbines

No Comments »

British firm to design mammoth offshore wind turbines with 275m wingspan that produce three times power of standard models

10MW Aerogenerator X offshore turbine design

The revolutionary 10MW Aerogenerator X, a new breed of mammoth offshore wind turbine in development by British firm Arup.

Illustration: Wind Power Limited and Grimshaw

British, American and Norwegian engineers are in a race to design and build the holy grail of wind turbines – giant, 10MW offshore machines twice the size and power of anything seen before – that could transform the global energy market because of their economies of scale.

Today, a revolutionary British design that mimics a spinning sycamore leaf and which was inspired by floating oil platform technology, entered the race. Leading engineering firm Arup is to work with an academic consortium backed by blue-chip companies including Rolls Royce, Shell and BP to create detailed designs for the “Aerogenerator”, a machine that rotates on its axis and would stretch nearly 275m from blade tip to tip. It is thought that the first machines will be built in 2013-14 following two years of testing.

But the all-British team of designers and engineers, which includes Eden project architects Grimshaw, is in stiff competition with other groups. Earlier this year US wind company Clipper, which has close ties with the US Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory,announced plans to build 10MW “Britannia” turbines in north-east England.

Based on a scaled-up version of the conventional wind turbines now common in the British landscape, these giants would be fixed to the sea bed but would stand nearly 600ft high above the waves. If they prove technically and financially feasible, each turbine should be able to generate enough electricity to provide 5,000-10,000 homes and, says Clipper, should create energy equivalent to 2m barrels of oil in their 25-year lifetime.

Meanwhile, Norwegian firm Sway is planning to build massive floating turbines that would stick straight out of the sea from 100m-deep floating “masts” anchored to the sea bed. An EU-sponsored research project is also investigating 8–10MW turbines, and other American and Danish companies are planning 9MW machines. Full-scale prototyes of all three leading designs are expected to be complete within three years.

“There is a wonderful race on. It’s very tight and the prize is domination of the global offshore wind energy market,” said Feargal Brennan, head of offshore engineering at Cranfield University, where much of the Aerogenerator development work has been carried out.

“The UK has come late to the race, but with 40 years of oil and gas experience we have the chance to lead the world. The new [Aero-generator] turbine is based on semi-submersible oil platform technology and does not have the same weight constraints as a normal wind turbine. The radical new design is half the height of an equivalent [conventional] turbine,” he said. He added that the design could be expanded to produce turbines that generated 20MW or more.

The largest wind turbines currently installed are mostly rated at around 3MW. By comparison, coal power stations typically have a capacity in gigawatts, or thousands of megawatts – it would take 180 of the new giant turbines to generate the equivalent capacity of a coal power station proposed this year for North Ayshire, Scotland.

Engineers say that scale is the key to wind power. Doubling the diameter of a conventional wind turbine theoretically produces four times as much power, but weighs eight times as much and can increase costs by a factor of eight. Offshore power is widely regarded as the future of renewable energy because the wind is much more reliable at sea, larger machines are possible to transport and install and there is far less public opposition.

On land, massive cranes and blades have to be driven to remote hilltops, and planning permission can take many years. However, the present generation of offshore turbines are 30-50% more expensive than their terrestrial counterparts, are harder to maintain and are more prone to corrosion.

The market for offshore power is expected to grow to hundreds of billions of dollars a year. Last year the European Wind Energy Association predicted that Europe would increase its offshore wind power from less than 2GW today to more than 150GW by 2030.

Britain, which has little upland space available for large wind farms,overtook Denmark in offshore wind generation in 2008 and now leads the world with 330 offshore turbines installed. It also has the world’s most ambitious plans to develop the wind resource, being committed to installing 12GW of offshore power by 2012. This is the equivalent of 2,500 of the largest 5MW machines presently developed.

John Sauven, director of Greenpeace UK, said: “It is critical that the UK government does not hinder the development of offshore wind power by cutting budgets for short-term gain. All our energy needs depend on this.”

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted on July 26th 2010 in News flash

Solar-powered plane takes off on test flight

No Comments »

Pilot André Borschberg leaves Swiss airfield in attempt to fly day and night without fuel

Borschberg takes off, bound for the Jura mountains.
 Borschberg takes off, bound for the Jura mountains.
Photograph: Denis Balibouse/AP

An experimental solar-powered plane whose makers hope to one day circle the globe using only energy collected from the sun took off for its first 24-hour test flight today.

The plane, with its 80-metre (263ft) wingspan, left Payerne, in Switzerland, shortly before 7am after overcoming an equipment problem that delayed a previous attempt, the Solar Impulse team said.

Clear blue skies mean the prototype aircraft will be able to soak up plenty of solar energy as it flies over the Jura mountains to the west of the Swiss Alps.

By mid-morning the pilot, André Borschberg, was cruising at 3,000 metres, trying to avoid low-level turbulence and thermal winds, which are frequent in the mountains.

He will take the plane to an altitude of 8,500 metres by this evening, when a decision will be made on whether to continue through the night using solar power stored in its batteries.

“The goal of the project is to have a solar-powered plane flying day and night without fuel,” said the team co-founder Bertrand Piccard. He added that this test flight – the third major step after a first “flea hop” and an extended flight earlier this year – would demonstrate whether the ultimate plan was feasible: to fly the plane around the world.

“This flight is crucial for the credibility of the project,” said Piccard, a record-breaking balloonist whose father and grandfather accomplished pioneering feats in the air and under water.

The team had hoped to make the 24-hour test flight last week, when days in the northern hemisphere were even longer, allowing the plane’s 12,000 solar cells to collect more energy before attempting to coast through the night.

But a problem with a key piece of communications equipment forced them to keep the plane on the ground while modifications were made. Every aspect of the aircraft is monitored by engineers, and much of the resulting data fed on to the team’s website and Twitter page.

Borscherg, the plane’s sole pilot, will decide by 8pm whether to continue through the night. If he goes ahead, the plane will slowly descend to 1,500 metres before midnight, and Borschberg will stay at that altitude until attempting a landing at dawn.

Piccard, who achieved the first nonstop circumnavigation of the globe in a balloon, the Breitling Orbiter III, in 1999, said that if he was successful the next step would be an Atlantic crossing. That flight would be done in a second, lighter prototype, and would involve new challenges and dangers.

Although the goal is to show that emissions-free air travel is possible, the team has said it does not see solar technology replacing conventional jet propulsion in the near future. Instead, the project is designed to test and promote new energy-efficient technologies.

 

 

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted on July 8th 2010 in News flash

Paris looks for power from turbines beneath the Seine

No Comments »

River currents could be harnessed at four bridges across the capital

River Seine, Paris

Paris is hoping to use underwater turbines to harness power from the river Seine.
Photograph: Martin Bureau/AFP/Getty Images

The river Seine, the historical “sacred river” running through Paris, inspired Monet, Matisse and even the British painter Turner, who sat on its banks to capture the scenery.

Now the landscape is to undergo a subtle change, with a plan to install eight turbines underneath the city’s celebrated bridges to raise energy from river currents.

Paris city hall is to launch an appeal this week for power companies to come up with suitable projects to install the turbines, or hydroliennes.

“After a study by our urban ecology service and the French waterways, four potential sites have already been identified,” Denis Baupin, the deputy mayor, told Le Parisien newspaper. One is to the west of the city, at the Pont du Garigliano, while the others are in central Paris, at the Pont de la Tournelle, Pont Marie and Pont au Change. Two energy-harnessing machines will be placed at each spot.

“At these places the current speeds up a little,” said Baupin. “The idea is to locate all the natural power sources that we have in Paris and that we might be able to exploit.”

French energy company EDF has already declared the idea “interesting”.

The companies interested in the project have until the autumn to submit proposals. The winner will be chosen next January and the first turbines or propellers installed by next spring.

While the bulk of the machinery to harness the currents of the Seine will be hidden under water, part of the structure of many modern hydro-mill prototypes sits above the water.

Paris authorities — already experimenting with the heating of buildings with water from underground springs, and installing mini-windmills on buildings — say the project is aimed more at raising public awareness of renewable energy than powering the city.

“We’re not expecting the moon and the stars with these techniques,” Baupin said, “but the educational impact of these experiments is just as important. Vélib [Paris's free bicycle scheme] has made Parisians realise they can use cycles in the city, and these renewable energy schemes will make them aware of the need to watch what they consume.”

The reaction of Le Parisien readers was mixed: “Bravo! Let’s hope the local authorities and fishing community understand the importance of this kind of energy,” one wrote.

Another said: “The idea seems good at first glance, but when they say before they’ve even started that the quantity of energy produced will be symbolic, almost ridiculous, why push ahead?”

“We’re going to throw a fortune into useless hydroliennes,” another commented. “Their cost will be considerably higher than the electricity produced. All that to be ‘educational’?” .

An underwater turbine has previously been placed under the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted on June 29th 2010 in News flash