Water for all

No Comments »

 

How can we secure a future for the people living on the front line of climate change? In Eastern Africa, environmental scientist Katharine Cross is helping to safeguard water resources that are becoming more and more unpredictable.

Climate change is already taking its toll in Eastern Africa. Even the snow caps of the iconic Mount Kilimanjaro are receding and are projected to disappear by 2025. In many areas, increasing populations and an ever-increasing demand for water are leading to conflicts over resources.

Katharine’s expertise as an environmental scientist, particularly in groundwater and river basin management, is being put to good use in the region. She and her colleagues are involved in a variety of projects across Tanzania, Uganda, Mozambique and Kenya which focus on strengthening institutions to better manage water resources between the different users such as farmers, hydropower companies and pastoralists.

They identify ways to adapt to climate change impacts which can include finding alternative sources of livelihood, rehabilitating river banks and improving dialogue between users to share water resources more equally. The aim is to make sure there is enough water in the region’s rivers to service all needs, as well as sustain the natural environment.

“I have always been interested in environmental issues, having studied environmental biology and environmental engineering and worked in the environmental consulting field on remediating soil and groundwater in contaminated sites. And I’ve always enjoyed outdoor activities such as hiking and skiing,” says Katharine.”

“But it was by undertaking development work with Engineers without Borders in Bolivia and Ghana that I became exposed to the need to invest in the environment to ensure improved health and access to resources by communities.”

Through close collaboration with IUCN’s Drylands Programme, the Water and Wetlands Programme for which Katharine works uses an integrated approach which considers aspects such as rangeland management within water catchment areas. This means working with governments and communities to plan how water resources are used and shared within a catchment and beyond to the wider ecosystem.

“What we’re helping to set up, and what the government is trying to formalize, are water associations made up of farmers, pastoralists and government representatives. The demand comes from the community and solutions come from local residents themselves,” explains Katharine.

Change takes time, especially when it involves changing the way natural resources are managed and governed. IUCN has worked for many years in the Pangani River Basin which is shared between Kenya and Tanzania and momentum is building.

“Slowly people are understanding the impact their use of water has on other people within the basin. For example, in Tanzania, people on the slopes of Kilimanjaro are extracting amounts of water which result in shortages in the dry, lowland areas. The forums that have been created and strengthened allow opportunities for these different users to negotiate over allocation and reduce conflicts,” says Katharine.

“There are many challenges ahead such as securing the long term investment needed to change people’s behaviour and attitude towards sharing water.

“People generally believe that water is a god-given gift and that there is no need to pay for abstraction. But in order to manage the basin, resources are required.”

Katharine says the highlights of her work include working with governments in various countries and being able to influence the way water resources are managed and really helping people cope with climate change in practical ways.

Many of the lessons and best practices from different projects are being applied by the government, specifically in Tanzania and Uganda, in other river basins, and they are also being scaled-up to other projects where IUCN is involved in the wider Eastern and Southern Africa region.

“It’s a great pleasure for me to work with such a dedicated team of IUCN staff who are implementing projects on the ground. They are extremely professional and achieve results despite high work pressures and often challenging circumstances.”
  • Share/Bookmark
Posted on December 14th 2011 in general interest

Water. Water Everywhere ~ Water Conservation Series no 2

No Comments »

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted on December 6th 2011 in videos

Water. Water Everywhere ~ Water Conservation Series

No Comments »

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted on December 6th 2011 in videos

The importance of Water

No Comments »

 

The importance of Water from WWF on Vimeo.

Of all the water on this blue planet of ours, only 3% of it is freshwater. And this precious, life-giving resource has seen a decline of 35% in the species that live within its realm since 1970. We must use water more wisely. We must make better use of the bounties and services that it provides. 

Find out where you fit in, and how you can help: wwf.panda.org/water

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted on December 1st 2011 in News flash

No Comments »
Irrigating crops in Nicaragua. Photo: N.Palmer/CIAT
Prized resource: The aim is to ensure a year-round supply of water
 
 ”I’ve been a farmer for more than 40 years, but I never had an opportunity like this,” says Victor Beltran.

Mr Beltran lives in northern Nicaragua, one of the poorest and driest areas of the country, where a pilot project to harvest rainwater is beginning to transform local agriculture and local people’s lives.

“Farmers have come from other parts of the country to see what is happening here. I no longer depend on seasonal rainfall. I produce three times more maize and have a surplus to trade,” says Mr Beltran.

The project involves building earthen dams to form reservoirs or ponds that can collect surface water run-off from the hills during the rainy season.

Victor Beltran: Photo: N Palmer/CIAT
Farmer Victor Beltran says the project has changed the way he works

The water is then used for irrigation during periods of drought.

“The problem in Nicaragua and the majority of tropical areas in Latin America is that you have a huge contrast between the rainy and the dry season,” says Gonzalo Zorrilla, who is directing the project.

“In Nicaragua’s case, you have a lot of rain for six months and then six months when there is practically none.”

Catching the rain

The idea for the initiative stemmed from work in southern Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay by the Latin American Fund for Irrigated Rice (FLAR) and supported by the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT).

In these countries, more than 1m hectares (2.5m acres) of rice have been irrigated with water collected by the farmers themselves.

Rainwater reservoir in Nicaragua. Photo: N   Palmer/CIAT
The key to the project is finding the right location to build a dam

“With our partners in Nicaragua, the local rice farmers’ association, we thought it could be possible to use the same technology to help small farmers in the tropics,” said Mr Zorrilla.

“We convinced a UN agency, the Common Fund for Commodities, CFC, to fund the project.”

The idea is to construct the reservoirs as cheaply and simply as possible.

A dam is built between two hillsides to catch the rainwater run-off and create a pool of water.

An outlet tube reinforced with steel bars lies underneath the dam, so all the farmer has to do to irrigate his crops is open the valve.

“If you go anywhere in northern Costa Rica, Panama or Nicaragua, there is massive unemployment during six months of the year. People have no income, no crops, and in severe cases their cattle are dying,” says Edward Pulver, agricultural scientist at FLAR.

When the project started, he says, many farmers were not optimistic about their future.

“But as soon as we started mentioning irrigation, their eyes lit up like Christmas tree lights because they had hope.

“They saw they didn’t have to be poor, there was a way out. It is incredibly impressive to see that.”

Carcass of a cow during Nicaragua's  dry season
Nicaragua is susceptible to floods – and drought

Fourteen dams have been completed or are being built in Nicaragua, and similar projects are under way in Costa Rica and southern Mexico.

“We are getting the same yields of maize in Nicaragua that you get in the Midwest in the US,” says Mr Pulver.

“Fresh corn was not available in the dry season. Now, because of irrigation, some farmers sell their whole production as fresh corn for human consumption,” says Mr Zorrilla.

This means a potential income of several thousand dollars per hectare, an amount that was “completely unimaginable in the past”, according to Mr Zorrilla.

The project has also helped farmers to vary their diet, as some of them have introduced a small fish, tilapia, to the reservoirs.

Farming’s future?

Many countries in Latin America, including Mexico, Colombia, Ecuador, Bolivia and Costa Rica have the right topography and conditions to harvest water, says Mr Pulver.

“In Latin America we have excess water. Our problem is we have flooding, so if we can just capture this water, store it and plant crops during the dry season, we can feed ourselves very easily.

“This technology can work in the poorest of countries, and the CFC wants us to take the idea to Africa.”

Soybean harvesting. Photo: N Palmer/CIAT
Irrigation also means more varied crops can be grown

A key aim of the pilot project, which ends in 2012, is to train local people and officials so they can build their own dams and reservoirs.

“If we finish with just 14 dams in Nicaragua, nothing would have change there because too few farmers would have benefited,” says Mr Zorrilla.

“Globally, despite the challenges of growing populations, water is really under used.

“The intelligent, sustainable use of water could give rise to a water revolution, a blue revolution,” he says.

One key factor seems already guaranteed: the conviction of the farmers themselves.

“If you expand access to this technology, you can help to lessen the impact drought has in Nicaragua,” says Mr Beltran.

“Farmers can have a balanced diet, money for their farm and for their children’s education. On my farm, there’s now work for four of us.

“This project has really changed the way we think.”

Farmer hoeing the land in Nicaragua. Photo N Palmer/CIAT
Harvesting rainwater is changing some people’s views about life on the land
  • Share/Bookmark
Posted on November 25th 2011 in News flash

Africa’s great ‘water grab’

No Comments »

Foreign investors aren’t just after land in Africa. Access to water is essential – which can bring them into direct competition with the needs of local communities

MDG :  Herder cross the Niger river with their , Mopti , Mali

Passengers in a pirogue watch Fulani herders cross the Niger river with their cattle on the outskirts of Mopti, Mali. Photograph: Florin Iorganda/Reuters

The banks of the Niger river, in southern Mali, have been flooded by a steady stream of foreigners. Coveted by foreign investors eager to snap up large tracts of fertile farmland, the river basin has been at the centre of a race to get hold of African land at rock-bottom prices. Meanwhile, last week, hundreds of smallholder farmers and civil society activists flocked to the same river basin for the first international conference to tackle the global rush for land.

West Africa‘s largest river, the Niger is thought to sustain over 100 million people as it snakes 4,180km through Mali and Niger before emptying into Nigeria’s colossal Niger Delta. In Mali, the Office du Niger is home to the vast majority of the country’s largescale land deals, seen by campaigners as emblematic of the “land grabs” taking place in developing countries. Recent estimates suggest that foreign investment in Mali’s limited arable land jumped by 60% between 2009 and 2010. But the potential knock-on effects of these land deals on local communities’ access to water has rarely made it centre-stage.

Ongoing research from the London-based International Institute for Environment and Development seeks to redress this blindspot, honing in on how such land deals might affect water access for fishing, farming and pastoralist communities. In a policy paper out on Thursday, the IIED’s Jamie Skinner and Lorenzo Cotula warn that an alarming number of African governments seem to be signing away water rights for decades, with major implications for local communities.

Investors in farmland are, understandably, after land with high growing potential – either land with lots of rainfall or land that can be irrigated. What Skinner and Cotula note is a worrying trend where governments are being rushed into signing away water rights during negotiations where they were initially only considering leasing land.

In many cases, say Skinner and Cotula, governments seem willing to simply provide water free of charge. In Mali and Sudan, for example, some investors have been given unrestricted access to as much water as they need. In other cases, where investors must pay to use water, they are often charged according to how much land is irrigated rather than how much water is used.

The role water plays in fuelling the global rush for land has received significant attention. It is no coincidence, observers say, that the most aggressive foreign investors are also those facing water shortages at home. This year, risk analysis firm Maplecroft said the results from itswater stress index showed why India, South Korea and China, along with the oil rich Gulf states, are racing to buy land in developing countries and grow crops abroad. The chairman and former CEO of Nestlé, Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, has gone so far as to say the global rush for farmland is actually a “great water grab”. He writes in Foreign Policy: “With the land comes the right to withdraw the water linked to it, in most countries essentially a freebie that increasingly could be the most valuable part of the deal.”

But the effect of these deals on local communities’ water access has been a black hole in the debate around land grabs. And it is a severe omission, according to Skinner and Cotula, who stress how long-term contractural commitments with investors can jeopardise water access not only for those living near the agricultural investments but also for those living downstream. “When land is assigned to private investors, the deal only impacts directly on existing users of that land,” they explain. “Allocating water to irrigated agriculture potentially affects a much broader range of users.”

A 2011 report from researchers at the University of Manchesterhighlights similar concerns: “Impacts are likely to be far more extensive than might be anticipated from the area of land occupied … restriction or interruption of flows of water in an area occupied in one part of the landscape will have potentially widespread downstream impacts.”

According to the IIED paper, in some cases estimates of potential water requirements have run so large that major dam projects are being considered to ensure supply. The controversial Gibe III dam in Ethiopia, for example, will help irrigate 150,000 hectares that the government has allocated to investors. A report published by the African Development Bank says the project could lower the water level of Kenya’s Lake Turkana, on which around half a million people depend, by eight metres by 2024.

In an earlier review of land deal contracts, Cotula noted that leases in semi-arid countries would be worthless if they did not ensure access to sufficient water for agricultural use. But just as land without water may be useless to agricultural investors, the same goes for local communities. Will future water conflicts be triggered by the downstream effect of today’s land grabs in Africa? Land, it seems, is only a small part of the land grab equation.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted on November 24th 2011 in News flash

WATER: THE NEW OIL

No Comments »

As the Earth warms and the world’s population grows, competition for dwindling supplies of fresh water will intensify. As the biggest industrial user of water, the energy sector can either fight to maintain its share, or learn to conserve.

Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Coal plant - Wikipedia Commons

The stakes are high. As Jim Rogers, CEO of Duke Energy, put it, “water is the new oil.

For utilities especially, water is precious. They use it most of all to cool steam generators that may be driven by coal, natural gas, nuclear or even solar energy.

In 2008, at least one nuclear reactor, inAlabama, shut down briefly because water supplies dried up during the great Southeast drought that summer. Reactors in Western Europe shut down during the 2006 heat wave and were threatened by asharp drop in river levels again this year.

Most climate models predict that the drought-stricken Southwestern United States will grow even drier and hotter–like Texas–as global warming progresses. That will harm the energy sector along with agriculture, tourism and recreation, and many other kinds of industry.

“The competition between water and energy needs represents a critical business, security, and environmental issue, but it has not yet received the attention that it deserves,” said Diana Glassman, co-author of a report by the World Policy Institute and EBG Capital on “The Water-Energy Nexus.”

“Energy production consumes significant amounts of water, and vice versa. In a world where water scarcity is a major and growing challenge, water deserves a place on the energy agenda alongside cost, carbon and security considerations.”

The report notes that coal- and oil-fired power plants use twice as much water as natural gas-fired plants. Nuclear plants use three times as much.

Some of the biggest water hogs are oil extractors, according to the report. Mining the thick tar sands of Canada may require 20 times more water than conventional oil drilling. In parts of parched south and west Texas, natural gas fracking may be curtailed due to lack of water.

Renewable energy isn’t exempt from this problem. Although wind and solar photovoltaic plants use little or no water, water-cooled solar thermal plants use five times as much as gas-fired plants. (Some solar thermal producers, like BrightSource Energy, have switched to air cooling to save water at their desert sites, despite the loss of some generating efficiency.)

And biofuels fermented from soybeans or corn “can consume thousands of times more water than traditional oil drilling, primarily through irrigation,” according to the World Resources Institute.

The best solutions—because they carry so many benefits—are programs to conserve energy and water consumption. Water-related users in California account for about 19 percent of the state’s electricity consumption, so every gallon saved through drip irrigation or improved industrial processes saves energy. Similarly, every kilowatt-hour saved means less need to build or operate power plants that use precious water.

PG&E and other utilities are also installing new air or “dry” cooling systems on their power plants that save more than 90 percent of the water required by traditional “wet” cooling.

Last but not least, wind and solar photovoltaic plants will help out as they replace traditional fossil generation. A thousand megawatts of wind power can save 1.3 billion gallons of water annually, according to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted on September 8th 2011 in News flash

What fruit or vegetable has the largest water footprint?

No Comments »

Some crops require water-hungry irrigation systems to thrive, but what is the thirstiest crop of all?

Leo blog : Cucumbers in Spain

A farmer harvests cucumbers at a greenhouse in Algarrobo, near Malaga. Photo: Jorge Guerrero/AFP/Getty Images

The TV footage over the past week showing farmers in Spain having to discard huge amounts of cucumbers because of false suspicions relating to the E coli outbreak is heartbreaking. What an utter waste. But what really got to me was the thought of how much water was being wasted. Just think how much water it must take to grow a cucumber in an arid place such as Spain. Given that we are also experiencing drought-like conditions here in parts of the UK, it left me curious to know which fruit and veg consume the most water when they are being grown?

T Keeble, by email

Without Spain’s water-intensive agriculture sector much of northern Europe would struggle during the winter months to feed itself on “summer” crops such as tomatoes, cucumbers and melons.

It has long been noted that every time we bite into, say, a Spanish-grown tomato we are consuming Spanish water – a resource that is in increasingly short supply. As a result, a new environmental yardstick has come to the fore in recent years: the water footprint.

The water footprint of food stuffs such as beef, rice and wheat are known to be proportionately much higher than most fruit and vegetables. Arecent report by WRAP and WWF examined how much water is wasted in the UK when food is thrown away. It found that nearly two-thirds of this wasted embedded water originated outside the UK. Perhaps surprisingly, it was Ghana’s water-intensive cocoa beans that caused it to rank first in the list of countries for which the UK’s wastes water. This is because it takes, on average, 24,000 litres of water to produce just one kilogram of chocolate, according to the Water Footprint Network. By comparison, one kilogram of tomatoes requires 160 litres of water. (For the full breakdown of food types, view the table on page 54 of this PDF.)

But would this information about embedded water in food change your shopping or eating habits? And what about other “inputs”? Would knowing the carbon footprint of food items affect your decision-making?

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted on June 6th 2011 in News flash

IUCN supports partnership on sustainable sanitation and water management

No Comments »

The IUCN Water Programme recently engaged in a partnership on sustainable sanitation and water management, to share knowledge and contribute to a new comprehensive toolbox which links water management, sanitation, and agriculture.

For many decades water managers have dealt with protecting, storing, distributing, and cleaning water. Many of these activities link closely with sanitation provision and treatment. Linking the knowledge between these different water management functions and processes is often complex, due to institutional and scientific boundaries. Nutrients in the water which flow between people, the environment, and industrial processes can be precious resources providing valuable ecosystem services. Equally, nutrients and other substances can often pollute and cause damage, and this needs to be recognised and managed to minimise pollution, especially from land into freshwater, and from freshwater systems into the marine environment.

The Sustainable Sanitation and Water Management (SSWM) Toolbox and its partner network bring together information, advice and knowledge on a range of topics designed to save and recycle water, regain resources and protect aquatic ecosystems. The Toolbox allows users to find all the relevant information in one location, and provides a range of information for practitioners from process and planning tools, software and technological approaches, diagnostic and implementation tools as well as training courses.

We see collaboration with key user groups in the Toolbox as an excellent means of sharing the many practical lessons IUCN has from around the world on how to implement IWRM to benefit both people and nature”, said Mark Smith, IUCN Water Programme Director.

The website links all the different tools with publications, articles and weblinks, case studies, training material and presentations. Targeted at local level water practitioners, the Toolbox is also a valuable asset for international and research organisations, NGO’s, local leaders and municipalities, business and environmental agencies.

We value the experience of the IUCN Water Programme on toolkit development and the hybrid subjects they deal with such as environmental flows, payments for ecosystem services and water governance. Integrating this thinking into the existing Toolbox will help further strengthen the information we have, and help in the urgently needed upgrade in how we manage our water and our reliance on it for drinking, sanitation, and food production” saidJohannes Heeb, CEO of Seecon International.

Katharina Conradin, SSWM project leader, added that “other partners such as UNDP, ICLEI, WSSCC, and IWA have joined and contributed to our work. We are very pleased to now also include IUCN’s expertise, particularly on the topic of Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM), into our toolbox and incorporate the concept more comprehensively in the sanitation and water management approach.”

In order to further position the SSWM Toolbox as a reference for capacity development in the water and sanitation sector, feedback on the SSWM Toolbox is welcomed to discuss its strengths and weaknesses, as well as the way forward for further ensuring its applicability by professionals and stakeholders from within and outside the sector.

Seecon international gmbh is the implementing organisation in the development of the toolbox, funded by the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) and the German Agency for International Cooperation and Capacity Building for Integrated Water Resources Management.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted on June 3rd 2011 in News flash

A single source for clean water and fuel

No Comments »

ALGAE are being put to work performing a unique double duty: cleaning up sewage waste while simultaneously producing biofuel.

Clean fuel (Image:  A. Sue Weisler/RIT)

Clean fuel (Image: A. Sue Weisler/RIT)

All algae feast on phosphates and nitrogen-containing compounds, converting them to lipids. Some of these oils can be converted to biofuel, but only a few algal species produce lipids of the right type and quantity to be easily converted to fuel. In theory, though, algae are a perfect renewable fuel source. The main obstacle is that brewing the right nutrient mix can be prohibitively expensive.

Now, in work for a master’s thesis, Eric Lannan, a mechanical engineer at Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) in New York and colleagues have identified three types of microalgae - ScenedesmusChlorella andChlamydomonas - that efficiently convert nutrients to fuel on a diet of municipal waste water, while happily living in its harsh, salty environment. In a lab test, it took just three days for the algae to gobble up 99 per cent of the ammonia, 88 per cent of the nitrate and 99 per cent of the phosphates in a broth resembling that from a domestic sewage treatment plant, turning themselves into rich sources of fuel even as they purified the water.

“People had looked at algae to clean waste water, others to make biodiesel,” Lannan says. “We’re putting those ideas together.”

In a few months, Lannan’s group plans to install a 4000-litre pond at a waste-water treatment plant near Rochester. F. Drew Smith, who heads compliance for the area’s treatment plants, believes it is an experiment worth trying, as algae could yield several times more biodiesel than crops grown on the same amount of land (see Illustration).

Jeff Lodge, a microbiologist at RIT, says the process should be economically feasible for treating up to 200,000 litres of waste water a day – the load of a typical rural US treatment plant. “We can treat the water and yield enough clean biodiesel for a rural area to run a fleet of trucks,” he says.

The process has two phases. During the first three days, the algae produce lipids. Then, once the waste water is depleted of nitrogen and phosphates, the algae respond to starvation by turning their reserve nutrient stores into even more lipids.

After six days, the algae can be harvested. The team plans to use a mechanical pressing method to extract the oil, leaving behind biomass that could be composted, fed into an anaerobic digester to make methane, or sold as a feedstock to make ethanol.

There are limitations, though. In order to work year-round, the ponds must be heated in winter. For this, the team suggests using waste heat from the treatment plant. Too many sunny days in a row can also slow production, as algae divert resources into producing protection from the rays.

And large treatment plants need to process and discharge water quickly; accommodating a pond in which algae-infused waste water sits for six days could be a problem.

Smith says his biggest plant, which processes nearly 390 million litres a day, could accommodate a pond about the size of a small swimming pool to start with. “If the algae process turns out to be highly productive, we can certainly find enough land,” he says.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted on April 19th 2011 in News flash